Friday, December 20, 2024

How Kamala Harris becomes president

Vice President Harris

Kevin Drum's excellent hed yesterday on his blog:


The comments to his post get into the constitutional issues if, as seems possible if unlikely, Congress doesn't have a speaker to read the election results as per the Constitution.

Interesting comment by "Altoid":
On a strict reading, I think what formally makes somebody president is the action of the VP reading out the tally of electoral votes and declaring who the president is, per the 12th amendment

The timetable in the 20th amendment presumes that this has occurred. And the House has to have elected a speaker and adopted rules so it can be ready to choose a president if no candidate has a majority---even if that isn't a real possibility, they have to be organized as a legislative body just in case. Until then they're just a random mass meeting.

The absolutely most interesting sidelight here is that if the House can't pick a president, guess who takes the office? The outgoing administration's VP, that's who.

That provision is for a very narrow case that hasn't [ever] happened yet, but I think that situation is a decent analogy, and so a good guide to what should happen if the House can't get itself organized and pick a speaker.

The presidency really can't be vacant (a survival of the monarchy the office descends from) so somebody has to exercise its authority. 

I'd argue that the 12th amendment says that person would be the current VP.

Labels: , , ,

Tuesday, December 17, 2024

The choice

Driftglass

Labels: , ,

Drones, UFOs? Ask Trump

New York Times

Easiest way to settle questions about drones and aircraft in our skies? Just ask Donald Trump. He knows all about the issue:

"Technology — nobody knows more about technology than me." (December 2018.)

"I know more about drones than anybody. I know about every form of safety that you can have." (January 2019.)

"Having a drone fly overhead — and I think nobody knows much more about technology, this type of technology certainly, than I do." (January 2019.)

If you're ancient like me, you probably remember Watch Mister Wizard, an early TV show that explained scientific principles with simple experiments. 

Trump could call his press conferences "Ask President Trump" and use them for monologues about, well, everything, because nobody knows more than Donald Trump.

Labels: , ,

The Biggest Lie of the Year? Trump and Vance

Biggest Liars of the Year

....To get media attention, then-vice presidential candidate JD Vance acknowledged, sometimes “I have to create stories.”

And so, with a brazen disregard for facts, Donald Trump and his running mate repeatedly peddled a created story that in Springfield, Ohio, Haitian immigrants were eating pet dogs and cats.

With this claim, amplified before 67 million television viewers in his debate against Democratic presidential nominee Vice President Kamala Harris, Trump took his anti-migrant, the U.S. border-is-out-of-control campaign agenda to a new level.
“In Springfield, they're eating the dogs,” Trump said Sept. 10. “The people that came in. They're eating the cats. They're eating the pets of the people that live there. And this is what's happening in our country. And it's a shame.”
City and county officials said repeatedly that it was not happeningRebuttals did not diminish the consequences: Dozens of bomb threats at schools, grocery stores and government buildings....

After the threats subsided, some Haitians didn’t want to go in public or send their children to school. The police department sent an officer to protect churchgoers at a Haitian Creole Sunday afternoon mass. Haitian restaurant owners and schoolchildren heard taunts from people using Trump’s words.

"‘Dad, do we eat dogs at the house?’" Jacob Payen, a Haitian Community Alliance spokesperson and business owner, recalled his 7-year-old son asking.

The Haitian population in Springfield swelled since 2021 as people fled Haiti’s violence and instability. City officials estimated 12,000 to 20,000 Haitians had come to this city of about 58,000 residents in 2020, after hearing about jobs and low living costs. Most Haitians live in the U.S. legally under a temporary federal protection President Joe Biden extended....

Vance’s central role in fanning unwarranted attention on a city in the state he represents in the U.S. Senate caused resentment among some locals. "Vance threw us under the bus," said Rob Baker, a political science professor since 1987 at Springfield’s Wittenberg University.

....Trump increased his voter support in Clark County, Ohio, which includes Springfield, this year above what he garnered in his 2016 and 2020 campaigns.

In choosing the 2024 Lie of the Year, the claims by Vance and Trump about Haitians eating pets stood out. It was an absurd statement that Trump raised unprompted on the debate stage.

And neither Trump nor Vance stopped there. They stuck with the narrative for the rest of the campaign over objections of allies who debunked it and pleaded with them to let it go. When challenged by voters and interviewers, Trump said he heard it on TV; Vance said constituents had called his office with the claim.

"What am I supposed to do? Hang up the phone and tell them they’re a liar because the media doesn’t want me to talk about it?" Vance said in October.

Emboldened by Vance’s embrace of the rumor, Trump’s debate outburst cemented lasting consequences, stigmatizing a town and its residents in the name of campaign rage. For those reasons, Trump and Vance own the 2024 Lie of the Year....

Rob's comment:
Vance: "What am I supposed to do? Hang up the phone and tell them they’re a liar because the media doesn’t want me to talk about it?"

Surely even Vance isn't that dumb. He and Trump should have investigated the validity of the claim before using it. The Biggest Lie of the Year makes them The Biggest Liars of the Year.

Labels: , , , , , , , ,

Monday, December 16, 2024

Trump walks back lowering grocery prices because 'It's very hard'

Trump's campaign promise to lower grocery prices was pure bullshit. He now suggests that asking him to do something difficult like that is unfair.


Labels: ,

Drones, planes or UFOs?


See also Game this out

Labels: ,

Our know-it-all president-elect

Nicholas Kamm/AFP/Getty Images

Add another area of expertise to Donald Trump's encyclopedic knowledge of, well, just about everything: he knows more than anybody about cryptocurrency.

Want to know more about the guy who knows more than you and everyone else? See Nobody knows more than Trump.

Labels:

Saturday, December 14, 2024

Kimberly Guilfoyle

2024: Kimberly Guilfoyle

Labels: , , , ,

Trump already walking back campaign promises

Photo: Nicholas Kamm

Gee, what a surprise: Trump is reneging on his campaign promises even before he takes office.

Kevin Drum on the unsurprising news:

....Trump has been lying for so long about how terrible things are that he can hardly claim they're even worse than that.

But that's not stopping him. On Sunday he told NBC's Kristen Welker he "couldn't guarantee" that his tariffs wouldn't raise prices. That's certainly not anything he's said before.

Then today he told Time that maybe he wouldn't be able to bring down the price of groceries after all. "It's hard to bring things down once they're up." he said, accurately. "You know, it's very hard." This, of course, was widely known all along. In fact, it would probably be disastrous if prices fell.

I expect these are just the first of many walkbacks. He can't do most of the ridiculous shit he promised over and over, and the stuff he can accomplish will mostly be because Biden already accomplished it for him. But he'll figure out a way to take credit for it anyway.

 See also Trump "making shit up"

Labels: , , , ,

Monday, December 09, 2024

Trump tries to bully Democrats

Now Senator Adam Schiff
From The Hill :

Sen. Adam Schiff (D-Calif.) said President-elect Trump's threat to throw members of the House committee that investigated rioting at the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021, in jail is a signal “that no one better hold him to account.”
“This is not just about retribution against those of us on the committee,” Schiff said on MSNBC’s “Morning Joe” on Monday.

“This is about sending a message that no one better hold him to account in his second term.…He is intent on trying to break down these checks and balances in our system,” Schiff added, referring to Trump. “That’s where the danger lies more so than to the members of the committee.”
During his first sit-down interview since winning the election in November, Trump indicated to “Meet the Press” moderator Kristen Welker that he would not explicitly order those he’s appointing to top positions to go after his political enemies, but he referenced jailing members who served on the House panel that investigated Jan. 6.

“All of us that worked on the Jan. 6 committee are proud of the work that we did,” said Schiff, who served on the panel. “We exposed one of the darkest chapters of our history when a president incited a violent attack on the Capitol just to try to stop the peaceful transfer of power.”

Former Rep. Liz Cheney (R-Wyo.), who served on the Jan. 6 committee, also spoke out against Trump’s threat, calling his remarks an “assault on the rule of law.”

“Here is the truth: Donald Trump attempted to overturn the 2020 presidential election and seize power,” she said in the statement provided to The Hill.

Meanwhile, former Rep. Adam Kinzinger (R-Ill.), who also sat on the committee, said he has “absolutely no worries” that Trump will put him behind bars....

Labels: , , , , ,

Saturday, December 07, 2024

Old San Francisco

Seals Stadium 1960

I was thrilled to see Ted Williams play in an exhibition game at Seals Stadium when the Seals were a farm team for the Boston Red Sox. In his first at bat, he drilled a line drive single to right field. A home run would have been better, but I wasn't disappointed.

Labels: , , ,

Remembering KSAN

Labels: , , ,

Friday, December 06, 2024

What's next for the Great Highway?

Photo by Michael Durand


The four-lane highway overlooking Ocean Beach became the site of one of the most heated political disputes in San Francisco this election cycle.

Proposition K, a ballot measure which aimed to permanently shut-down the stretch of the Upper Great Highway (UGH) from Lincoln Way to Sloat Boulevard and convert it into a full-time city park, passed Nov. 5.

Supporters find excitement in the expansion of the City’s part-time public space, which has been closed to most vehicles on weekends and holidays since 2020. Opposition for shutting down this space largely comes from residents who commute to Daly City and the South Bay via the highway, along with those who have concerns over the rerouting of commuter traffic.

Despite being shot down by approximately 60% of Sunset District and 70% of Richmond District voters, the measure passed citywide by 54.7%, with support coming mostly from the City’s eastside residents.

Now, the City is quickly working to fully activate the space as a “car-free promenade” by early next year. On Nov. 21, the City was awarded a $1 million grant from the California State Coastal Conservancy to fund art projects, water fountains, trash bins, event programming and dune restoration.

The City is also in the process of applying for a Coastal Commission permit, which is needed before the space can be actualized as a city park. 

The current weekend shutdown agreement remains in-place until the City obtains this permit, or until the already scheduled end of the program on Dec. 31, 2025, whichever comes first....


Labels: , , , , , , , ,

Group photo

Everybody smile!
Kevin Drum
This is the Flaming Star Nebula, aka IC 405, a combination emission/reflection nebula in the Auriga constellation.

I took this picture Sunday night after a multi-month layoff, and it was the best night of astrophotography I've ever had. Usually something goes wrong during the imaging session—it's always weird and different each time—but the sky was perfect on Sunday and everything went great. 

I set up the scope with no trouble, pressed Go, and it took pictures steadily for the next eight hours with no complaints. 

In the end, I got more than 100 subs of four minutes each, partly because it was a long winter night and partly because everything went so smoothly. This is by far my most productive session ever....
Rob's comment:
Like all pictures of the cosmos, it looks like a flaming nothingness, which, I suppose, is a form of cosmic realism. Not that there's nothing there but that there's nothing human, except the fact of the picture itself.

Later: I should add that whatever of human interest is there is so far away that we'll never know about it.

Labels: , ,

Thursday, December 05, 2024

Trump and art

Trump hung this painting in the White House
 

Labels: , , ,

Wednesday, December 04, 2024

Right-wing art revival?

Trump Crossing the Swamp

Now that Trump has won a second term, will we see a revival of right-wing art like the above? At least it will be good for some laughs under a president who has no sense of humor.

Labels: ,

The JFK Assassination at 60



Labels: ,

Monday, December 02, 2024

Unpacking the pardon

What did Hunter Biden do and what is a presidential pardon?

One thing is certain: If he hadn't been Joe Biden's son, Hunter's case would have been settled one way or another years ago.

On the morality of pardoning your own son? I like a quote from E.M. Forster
“If I had to choose between betraying my country and betraying my friend, I hope I should have the guts to betray my country.”
What if it's about a son you love, not a friend? True, Biden promised not to pardon Hunter, but he still made a morally defensible choice, since---unlike the implications of the Forster dilemma---the pardon didn't do any harm to his country.

See also Kevin Drum on the pardon.

Labels:

Bernie Sanders: Pissing against the wind

By Kelby Vera
Dec 1, 2024

Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) might not be a big fan of billionaires, but he can agree with Elon Musk on one big thing.

The left-wing legislator gave a small bit of credit to tech mogul and Donald Trump ally, Elon Musk, while criticizing the government’s outsized defense budget in a social media post on Sunday.

“Elon Musk is right,” Sanders declared in a post on X, the social media platform formerly known as Twitter. “The Pentagon, with a budget of $886 billion, just failed its 7th audit in a row. It’s lost track of billions.”

Pointing out congress’ reluctance to tackle the government’s glut of military spending, the avowed Democratic Socialist noted how “last year, only 13 senators voted against the Military Industrial Complex and a defense budget full of waste and fraud.”

“That must change,” he went on.

Defense spending has long been one of the bulkiest parts of the federal budget.

Congress approved $841 billion in funds for the Pentagon in 2024, an amount that added up to about 12.5% of the federal government’s total yearly expenses.

While the Democratic socialist and free market fanatic may seem like unlikely allies, Musk has already made a pledge to hedge government waste while copiloting Trump’s new Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) with former Republican presidential candidate, Vivek Ramaswamy.

Last month, Ramaswamy shot down seasoned State Department official, John Bolton, when the former National Security Advisor urged DOGE to redirect any of its potential savings to the military.

“We need to strengthen our military by focusing on the *effectiveness* of our defense spending, rather than just reflexively increasing the magnitude,” Ramaswamy said in response to one of Bolton’s appearances on CNN.

Rob's comment:
How likely is it that Trump and the Repugs will reduce military spending? Not very: How much does the US now spend on the military? The answer, give or take a few billion: $842 billion.

Labels: , , , ,

Saturday, November 30, 2024

Spotted Owls or Barred Owls?


MARIN COUNTY, CA — Two animal welfare organizations have filed a federal lawsuit to stop the hunting of a half-million barred owls across several states, including in federal parks and monuments, three of which are in Marin County.

The groups are also calling on superintendents of federal lands in California to opt out of the program, which was finalized by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service in August.

The program would cull about 500,000 barred owls over 30 years to try to protect Northern and California spotted owls, which are protected under the Endangered Species Act. Their territory has been encroached upon by barred owls from the Eastern U.S. and Great Plains for over a century.

Barred owls are slightly larger and more aggressive than spotted owls and displace them from their territory.

The conservation groups, Animal Wellness Action and The Center for a Humane Economy, wrote open letters to superintendents of parks and monuments in California, asking them not to allow hunting in their jurisdictions, which, in the Bay Area include Golden Gate National Recreation Area, Muir Woods National Monument, and Point Reyes National Seashore, in Marin County.

"This inhumane, unworkable barred-owl kill-plan is the largest-ever scheme to slaughter raptors in any nation, and a big stage for the killing will be more than a half dozen of California's iconic national parks," said Wayne Pacelle, president of Animal Wellness Action and the Center for a Humane Economy.

The animal welfare groups said in a press release that they had assembled over 200 supporting organizations around the country that signed a petition against the plan, including 20 Audubon Societies.

But the Marin Audubon Society supports the hunting plan, calling it the only way to protect spotted owls from being wiped out by more aggressive competitors.

"We're here to protect ecosystems, not species," said Barbara Salzman, Marin Audubon Society's president. And while the animal welfare groups argue the plan is not scalable and is "doomed to fail," Salzman said that there was no other choice. "To not try would be pretty irresponsible," she said.

Salzman said that the barred owls' more aggressive nature made them an existential threat to spotted owls and that the culling would be done under USFWS monitoring.

The USFWS said in its decision that the goal of the program was to protect spotted owls.

"The need for this action is that barred owls compete with northern and California spotted owls. Competition from barred owls is a primary cause of the rapid and ongoing decline of northern spotted owl populations," the record of decision reads.

There were six alternatives considered with varying degrees of scope and range, but all involved eliminating the barred owls from non-native areas through lethal means.

The animal welfare groups' lawsuit argues the plan is a violation of the Migratory Bird Treaty Act, but the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service contends that the law allows it to issue special permits for habitat management.

In an October letter to U.S. Interior Secretary Deb Haaland, the welfare organizations raised several objections, including the risk that hunters could kill the wrong owls and spent lead casings would be littered around forest lands. 

They contend the need to hunt nocturnally, and the scale of the plan makes it unworkable. The groups also said that range expansion was a natural phenomenon and barred owls were therefore entitled to the same protection as native species.

In letters to the superintendent of Muir Woods National Monument and Golden Gate National Monument, David Smith, and a separate letter to Anne Altman, the superintendent of Point Reyes National Seashore, the groups said the barred owl had been displaced by human activity, and its range expansion should be considered normal.
"Range expansion is a naturally occurring ecological phenomena, and it is a core characteristic of many species of birds and mammals. Indeed, it is the process by which so many species have come to occupy their current ranges. Just like there is no end to history, there is no end to species movements," the letter to Smith said.

Labels: , ,

Friday, November 29, 2024

Arrest warrants for Netanyahu, Gallant: "Crimes against humanity"

Lock them up!

Arrest warrants for Netanyahu and Gallant for war crimes

THE HAGUE (AP) — The International Criminal Court issued arrest warrants on Thursday for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, his former defense minister and Hamas officials, accusing them of war crimes and crimes against humanity over their 13-month war in Gaza and the October 2023 attack on Israel respectively.

Netanyahu condemned the arrest warrant against him, saying Israel “rejects with disgust the absurd and false actions.” In a statement released by his office, he said: “There is nothing more just than the war that Israel has been waging in Gaza.”

The decision turns Netanyahu and the others into internationally wanted suspects and is likely to further isolate them and complicate efforts to negotiate a cease-fire to end the fighting. But its practical implications could be limited since Israel and its major ally, the United States, are not members of the court and two of the Hamas officials were killed in the conflict.

Netanyahu and other Israeli leaders have condemned ICC Chief Prosecutor Karim Khan’s request for warrants as disgraceful and antisemitic. U.S. President Joe Biden blasted the prosecutor and expressed support for Israel’s right to defend itself against Hamas. Hamas also slammed the request.

The three-judge panel issued a unanimous decision to issue warrants for Netanyahu and his former defense minister, Yoav Gallant.
“The Chamber considered that there are reasonable grounds to believe that both individuals intentionally and knowingly deprived the civilian population in Gaza of objects indispensable to their survival, including food, water, and medicine and medical supplies, as well as fuel and electricity,” the decision said.
The court also issued a warrant for Mohammed Deif, one of the leaders of Hamas, over the October 2023 attacks that triggered Israel’s offensive in Gaza. The ICC chief prosecutor withdrew his request for warrants for two other senior Hamas figures, Yahya Sinwar and Ismail Haniyeh, after they were both killed in the conflict.

The Israeli Foreign Ministry said in September that it had submitted two legal briefs challenging the ICC’s jurisdiction and arguing that the court did not provide Israel the opportunity to investigate the allegations itself before requesting the warrants.

“No other democracy with an independent and respected legal system like that which exists in Israel has been treated in this prejudicial manner by the Prosecutor,” Foreign Ministry spokesperson Oren Marmorstein wrote on X. He said Israel remained “steadfast in its commitment to the rule of law and justice” and would continue to protect its citizens against militancy.

The ICC is a court of last resort that only prosecutes cases when domestic law enforcement authorities cannot or will not investigate. Israel is not a member state of the court. The country has struggled to investigate itself in the past, rights groups say.

Despite the warrants, none of the suspects is likely to face judges in The Hague anytime soon. The court itself has no police to enforce warrants, instead relying on cooperation from its member states.

Even so, the threat of arrest could make it difficult for Netanyahu and Gallant to travel abroad, although Russian President Vladimir Putin, who is wanted on an ICC warrant for alleged war crimes in Ukraine, recently showed he could still visit an ally when he traveled to Mongolia, one of the court’s member states, and was not arrested.

Member countries are required to detain suspects if a warrant has been issued if they set foot on their soil, but the court lacks a mechanism to enforce its warrants.

Khan sought warrants in May, accusing Netanyahu and Gallant of crimes including murder, intentionally attacking civilians, and persecution.

In a statement at the time, Khan alleged that Israel “has intentionally and systematically deprived the civilian population in all parts of Gaza of objects indispensable to human survival” by closing border crossings into the territory and restricting essential supplies including food and medicine.

At the same time, he accused three Hamas leaders — Sinwar, Deif and Haniyeh — of crimes linked to the Oct. 7, 2023 attacks, when Hamas-led militants stormed into southern Israel, killing some 1,200 people and abducting another 250. The three leaders are accused of crimes including murder, extermination, taking hostages, rape and torture.

“The Chamber found reasonable grounds to believe that Mr Deif, born in 1965, the highest commander of the military wing of Hamas (known as the al-Qassam Brigades) at the time of the alleged conduct, is responsible for the crimes against humanity of murder; extermination; torture; and rape and other form of sexual violence; as well as the war crimes of murder, cruel treatment, torture; taking hostages; outrages upon personal dignity; and rape and other forms of sexual violence,” a statement says.

Haniyeh was assassinated in what was believed to be an Israeli strike in Iran in July. Israel also claims to have killed Deif, but Hamas hasn’t confirmed his death. Sinwar, who was promoted to succeed Haniyeh as Hamas’ leader, was killed in a chance front-line encounter with Israeli troops in October.

Human rights groups have applauded the decision, which came more than six months after Khan made his initial request.

“The ICC arrest warrants against senior Israeli leaders and a Hamas official break through the perception that certain individuals are beyond the reach of the law,” the associate international justice director at Human Rights Watch, Balkees Jarrah, said in a statement.

Israel’s opposition leaders fiercely criticized the ICC’s move. Benny Gantz, a retired general and political rival to Netanyahu, condemned the decision, saying it showed “moral blindness” and was a “shameful stain of historic proportion that will never be forgotten.”

Yair Lapid, another opposition leader, called it a “prize for terror.”
Yuval Shany, an international law expert at Jerusalem’s Hebrew University, said travel for Netanyahu and Gallant to member states of the court could be complicated, including to countries that are close allies of Israel, like France or Britain. As members, they are obliged to carry out court decisions, including arrest warrants, although the court has no formal way to enforce its decisions, Shany said — as Putin’s Mongolia trip showed.
The case at the ICC is separate from another legal battle Israel is waging at the top U.N. court, the International Court of Justice, in which South Africa accuses Israel of genocide, an allegation Israeli leaders staunchly deny. Lawyers for Israel argued in court that the war in Gaza was a legitimate defense of its people and that it was Hamas militants who were guilty of genocide.

In the wake of the Oct. 7 attack, Israel launched a retaliatory offensive into Gaza that has killed more than 40,000 Palestinians, according to local health officials, who don’t say how many were fighters. It has displaced 90% of Gaza’s 2.3 million people from their homes and caused heavy destruction across the besieged territory.

Hamas is still holding around 100 hostages, about a third of whom are believed to be dead. Most of the rest were released in exchange for Palestinians imprisoned by Israel during a cease-fire last November.

Associated Press journalists Raf Casert in Brussels, Mike Corder in The Hague, and Josef Federman in Jerusalem contributed reporting.



Labels: , , , ,

Wednesday, November 27, 2024

Anti-Musk bumperstickers

Matthew Heller

The San Francisco Chronicle 
by Stephen Council

For years it was extremely rare to see a bumper sticker on a Tesla — the car's high price range and sleek aesthetic discourage strips of plastic. But that was before hatred for the carmaker’s billionaire CEO Elon Musk peaked.

Hawaii aquarium store manager Matthew Hiller knows how sharply the sentiment has shifted. When he first started selling anti-Musk bumper stickers on his Etsy page in 2023, sales came in at a trickle. Now, they’re at a flood: Musk’s ideological takeover of Twitter and election-year political antics have earned him a new wave of haters.

Some of them own Teslas. Hiller’s most popular sticker reads, “I bought this before we knew Elon was crazy.” He told SFGATE he’s now sold 15,000 anti-Musk stickers — and California is his biggest market.

Hiller launched the side hustle after test driving a Tesla. He said he’d wanted the car, but then decided handing $40,000 to a Musk-led company was off-limits. Hiller detested the billionaire’s actions at Twitter, now X: Musk manipulated the algorithm to boost his own posts, and amplified “all the wrong people,” Hiller said. The Honolulu resident thought he must not be alone.

“I figured at that time, there must be a lot of people like me who already have a Tesla, who are just like, 'Wow, I am embarrassed by this guy, I am sickened by this guy,'" Hiller said. 

So he designed the “before we knew” sticker, in simple black and white, and added it to his Etsy page in February 2023, where he previously sold a range of stickers bearing fish puns.

Sales mostly trickled in at five or six a day, on Etsy and on Amazon, but would speed up briefly after a viral X post or Reddit thread featured the sticker, Hiller said. 

Business Insider’s September 2023 story on the stickers didn’t name Hiller or his business, but it brought another spike. He designed other versions, like “Anti Elon Tesla Club,” and “F Elon,” using printer companies to create the stickers but doing all the packing and mailing with his wife.

Then Musk stuck his nose into the presidential race — before jumping in headfirst. He endorsed Donald Trump after the former president survived an assassination attempt in July, and went on to become Trump's most high-profile backer. 

He dispersed anti-immigrant tropes on X, jumped around onstage at a Trump rally (prompting a spike in sales, per Hiller), plowed money into ground campaigns and launched a $1-million-a-day lottery for swing-state voters.

The day after Trump’s Nov. 5 electoral victory, Hiller said, was his sticker shop’s biggest-ever day of sales. His Amazon storefront shows more than 2,250 purchases of anti-Musk stickers in the month before Nov. 26.

Hiller is now ordering the stickers en masse and printing huge stacks of address labels at once. He said that hundreds of the labels, almost every time, list California locations. “California is by far the highest state that I ship to, but San Francisco, within that, is certainly number one,” Hiller said.

Liberal Tesla drivers have been talking for years about a conflict between their love for the vehicles and their disdain for Musk; SFGATE reported on Bay Area drivers’ angst in 2022. 

The conflict appears to have even reached the Governor’s office: Gavin Newsom has announced a potential new rebate for electric-vehicle purchases, but per Bloomberg, it leaves Tesla out using a market-share clause. The top EV seller in the U.S., Tesla delivered almost 1.3 million cars from January through September.

Labels: , , , , , , , ,

Tuesday, November 26, 2024

Getting ready for Trump

California gets ready for the Trump Administration:

California is gearing up for a high-stakes clash with President-elect Donald Trump over environmental policy and immigration—and it’s happening before Trump is even sworn into office.

On Monday, Gov. Gavin Newsom issued a bold warning announcing he would intervene if the Trump administration rolls back the federal tax credit for electric vehicle rebates. If the credit is removed, Newsom pledged to provide a state-funded $7,500 rebate for electric vehicle buyers in California.
“[Z]ero-emission vehicles are here to stay,” Newsom said in a press release. “We will intervene if the Trump administration eliminates the federal tax credit, doubling down on our commitment to clean air and green jobs in California. We’re not turning back on a clean transportation future—we’re going to make it more affordable for people to drive vehicles that don’t pollute.”
California’s environmental transformation has been nothing short of remarkable.

Los Angeles was once shrouded in a thick haze of smog, and the state struggled with dangerous air quality into the late 20th century. Following the creation of the California Air Resources Board and the Federal Air Quality Act, both in 1967, the state began to dramatically improve its air quality. 

And now California is a national leader in the fight against climate change. It recently reached its goal of 100 days with 100% carbon-free, renewable electricity for at least a part of each day.

The state hit another milestone this year, with more than 2 million zero-emission vehicles sold in the state.

"This milestone comes a little over two years after California eclipsed the 1 million ZEV sales mark," Newsom’s office stated in a press release.

But the fight isn’t just about clean cars.

California Attorney General Rob Bonta is preparing for a legal showdown with Trump over immigration policies, including Trump’s planned mass deportations.

In a recent interview with The NationCalifornia Attorney General Rob Bonta made it clear the state will take every available step to protect its immigrant communities—no matter what the Trump administration throws at them:
“I’ve been preparing and readying for this possible moment for months, and in some cases years, depending on the topic,” said Bonta, adding, “They want to do what they want, when they want, how they want it, even if it violates the Constitution or a federal statute”....

Labels: , , , , , , , ,

Driftglass

Labels: ,

Monday, November 25, 2024

Why Trump does what he does

....Why go to the mat to pick and defend people Trump knows will raise questions about his judgment, heart or morality? In almost every case, there are similarly loyal and tested alternatives. Yet he often goes with the bad boys.

Why it matters: People who know Trump best tell us the answer lies in his view of humanity and power. Trump, they say, values loyalty, toughness, street smarts and self-protection foremost — and believes most people do bad things to get, hold and use power. Business and sexual transgressions don't trouble him like they do other presidents. Trump, more often than not, likes people who are like Trump....
Rob's comment:

The short answer, better than a long, pseudo-intellectual explanation of his character: he's just an asshole, a bully, a cheat, a creep, a know-it-all.

Like a lot of macho conservatives, he neurotically confuses cruelty with toughness.


And he's a crybaby. In spite of all the money and power, he still thinks he's a victim!

Labels: , , , ,