High-speed rail: Biggest bait-and-switch in history?

$98 billion estimate for California high-speed rail is lowball
by Ed Morrissey
Hot Air

November 5 

Earlier this week, we updated our coverage of the largest proposed public-works project in American history to note that its estimated cost had almost tripled in three years from $33 billion to $98.6 billion, as well as more than doubling in delivery time — and this before the project has even begun. 

 The state agency responsible for this boondoggle officially submitted their funding request to the California state legislature on Thursday, as the Los Angeles Times notes in an otherwise dull recapitulation of the news from earlier in the week. In fact, you have to get to the bottom of the article to see where the LAT buried the lede:

A bullet train business plan released Tuesday notes that the system cost of $98 billion could jump an additional $19 billion depending on the route and construction features.

Wait---what? The California High Speed Rail Authority board has the responsibility to make the decisions on “routes and construction features.” They can’t get any closer than 20% play in the numbers? What exactly did the CHSRA submit on Thursday---a letter to Santa Claus?

So what exactly are these variables that will add more than half as much cost as the project’s original price tag? Shag carpeting, spoilers on the caboose, quadrophonic stereo...what? The LAT doesn’t tell us; they just wait until the last paragraph to report that CHSRA warns that their projections require 20% play in the numbers.

Needless to say, the exploding cost has a few people pretty steamed. If one reads the story in reverse paragraph order (which is apparently what the LAT intends), the third paragraph has one Republican state senator promising to push a bill that will allow taxpayers to reverse their earlier approval for bonding measures for the project, presumably through a referendum. It also includes this very short-sighted criticism of the high-speed rail plan from an activist:

Other critics asserted the project was no longer the $33-billion project presented to voters three years ago. “This is the biggest bait and switch in California history,” Charles Voltz, a member of the Community Coalition on High Speed Rail, told board members.

Oh, come now, Mr. Voltz. You’re obviously not thinking big-picture here. Demanding as much as $117 billion for a train track that runs along the San Andreas Fault, which will at first only connect Corcoran and Borden, and eventually provide heavily-subsidized transportation between California’s two largest metropolises in a longer time than at least a half-dozen airlines already deliver without taxpayer subsidies is not the biggest bait and switch in California history. This is the biggest bait and switch in human history.

Check out these two blogs on high-speed rail here and here.

Peak Oil is still bunk

From the New York Times:

Renewable energy will rise[by 2035] as a percentage of energy used to 15 percent from 10 percent, but that will not provide for the growing demand. “The fossil fuel age will be extended for decades,” said Ivan Sandrea, president of the Energy Intelligence Group, a research publisher. “Unconventional oil and gas are at the beginning of a technological cycle that can last 60 years. They are really in their infancy.”