Friday, April 24, 2015

Wiggle ref quits, game goes on

San Francisco Citizen reports that the Wiggle referee publicity stunt yesterday was a bust. What exactly was the bike guy ref going to publicize? Apparently he thought he was going to reveal how awful motorists behaved on the Wiggle, but of course the Wiggle is famous as a city-sanctioned bike route wherein cyclists speed through that residential neighborhood, running stop signs and scattering pedestrians in their wake, on their way downtown or wherever they're in such a hurry to get.



Below is the kind of reporting by Stanley Roberts that bike guy Morgan Fitzgibbons doesn't like:



Morgan Fitzgibbons of the Wigg Party

Labels: , , , , ,

Passenger rail in the US: Only bicycles more insignificant


Always good to check in with Randal O'Toole for a reality-check on the country's transportation system:

Why can’t America have great trains?” asks East Coast writer Simon Van Zuylen-Wood in the National Journal. The simple answer is, “Because we don’t want them.” The slightly longer answer is, “because the fastest trains are slower than flying; the most frequent trains are less convenient than driving; and trains are almost always more expensive than either flying or driving.”

Van Zuylen-Wood’s article contains familiar pro-passenger-train hype: praise for European and Asian trains; selective statistics about Amtrak ridership; and a search for villains in the federal government who are trying to kill the trains. The other side of the story is quite different.

For example, he notes that Amtrak “ridership has increased by roughly 50 percent in the past 15 years.” But he fails to note that the biggest driver of Amtrak ridership is gasoline prices, which 15 years ago were at an all-time low (after adjusting for inflation). Now that prices are falling, so is Amtrak’s ridership.

He also ignores the fact that Amtrak’s ridership is minuscule compared with flying or driving. Whereas highways moved around 87 percent of passenger travel and airlines around 12 percent in 2012, Amtrak’s share was just 0.14 percent. While that is an increase from 0.11 percent in 1999, it is a decrease from 0.15 to 0.16 percent in most of the years from 1975 through 1993, when gas prices were high.

Trains are great for moving large volumes of goods from point A to point B. America’s freight railroads are the envy of the world, but they make most of their money moving coal from mine to power plant; grain from elevator to port; and containers from port to inland distribution center. The railroads conceded less-than-carload shipments, the freight equivalent of passengers, to trucks and air freight back in 1975 when the Railway Express Agency went out of business...

Rob's comment:

That's why Warren Buffett invested in freight rail, not passenger rail.




Labels: