How it happens

Rob Rogers

Retribution nation

Today's New York Times:

Why MAGA Nation Embraces Trump

To the Editor:

David Brooks takes a good stab at understanding the tensions between Enlightenment values and religiously grounded social mores, but the one thing he doesn’t explain is how those who think we need a return to a more “religious” moral center are completely enthralled by the likes of Donald Trump, who, whatever else you can say about him, never expresses anything in word or deed that would suggest he has any moral grounding at all. 

I know of no religious tradition that features revenge as a central moral tenet.

Ken Blickenstaff

Danville, Kentucky

Updating "The Dog That Didn't Bark"

Case Not Closed

In my recent post on the JFK issue, The Dog That Didn't Bark, I didn't pay attention to the blow-up of the 1995 Washington Post story behind Jefferson Morley as he spoke. Click on the title for the complete text:

The Oswald File: Tales of the Routing Slips

by Jefferson Morley

THE U.S. government's fifth effort in 31 years to satisfy the public's curiosity and doubts over the murder of President John F. Kennedy is quietly getting under way in a federal office building on E Street in downtown Washington.

The JFK Assassination Records Review Board, a five-member panel appointed last year by President Clinton, is collecting and starting to make public government documents related to Nov. 22, 1963.

The law creating the board requires the CIA, FBI and other government agencies to release virtually all of their files on the assassination. Even before the board was appointed, the CIA began releasing long-classified files to comply with the law. Since August 1993, the CIA has released 217,000 pages of documents, according to an agency spokesman.

Among those files, a historian and author has found materials that disclose for the first time who at CIA headquarters received detailed FBI reports about accused assassin Lee Harvey Oswald in the months prior to Kennedy's murder. 

The routing slips on the newly released files show that some senior CIA officials who knew about the FBI reports failed to share the information with agency colleagues in Mexico City who were trying to learn more about Oswald six weeks before the assassination.

"We're finding that there are an awful lot of records that are at the CIA or at the FBI or at other federal institutions and agencies that people have never seen," says John R. Tunheim, the chief deputy attorney general of the state of Minnesota, who is chairman of the review board. "And whether the information in those records is relevant to ultimate conclusions about the Kennedy assassination or not, at least everyone should have a chance to look at them."

Opinion polls consistently have shown that a majority of Americans are skeptical of the Warren Commission's conclusion in 1964 that Oswald acted alone. The subject has been revisited by the Rockefeller Commission in 1975 and the Senate Intelligence Committee in 1976 and reinvestigated by the House Committee on Assassinations in 1979.

Congress passed the JFK Assassination Records Act two and a half years ago to quell a new wave of speculation generated by Oliver Stone's conspiratorial movie epic "JFK." The film suggested that Kennedy was murdered because he was resisting escalation of the Vietnam War. 

The routing slips that shed new light on the CIA's handling of information about Oswald before the assassination were found by John Newman, a 20-year veteran of U.S. Army intelligence who now is an assistant professor of history at the University of Maryland. The routing slips identify which counterintelligence and covert operations officers in CIA headquarters received the FBI's reporting on Oswald in 1962 and 1963.

The question of what the CIA knew about Oswald first arose in early October 1963 after the 24-year-old ex-Marine visited Soviet and Cuban diplomatic offices in Mexico City seeking a visa. 

On Oct. 10, 1963, officials at CIA headquarters in Langley sent a cable to their subordinates in Mexico, telling them that they had not learned anything about Oswald in the previous year and a half. But the routing slips show that at least one of the CIA officials who drafted the cable had, in fact, signed for two FBI reports on Oswald.

The Oct. 10 cable itself has been in the public domain for many years. It is also well-known that the FBI was monitoring Oswald's activities at the time. He was an obvious subject of interest to both the FBI and CIA during that period in the Cold War, because he had defected to the Soviet Union in 1959. Moreover, after returning to the United States in June 1962, Oswald had become active in a U.S. group that supported Cuba's communist leader Fidel Castro.

What is new is that the latest information on Oswald was not passed along to CIA officials in the field. On Oct. 8, 1963 the agency's Mexico City station sent a query to CIA headquarters, marked "routine," saying it had observed a visit to the Soviet Embassy by an "American male who spoke broken Russian {and} said his name {was} Lee Oswald."

Two days later, Langley responded. The cable was drafted by four operations officers and approved by the agency's deputy director of covert operations. It provided details about Oswald's past attempts to renounce his citizenship and become a Soviet. It also stated that the "latest hdqs info" on Oswald "was State {Department} report dated May 1962 saying State had determined Oswald is still U.S. citizen."

Just days earlier though, two CIA counterintelligence offices had received an FBI report on Oswald's recent pro-Castro activities, according to the routing slips. The CIA had also received FBI reports on Oswald in September 1963 and in August 1962. The information included an interview with Oswald and detailed information about his personal life and his political activities related to Cuba. These reports, according to the routing slips, had been widely distributed at Langley.

After the assassination, the CIA gave the Oct. 10 cable to the Warren Commission but did not disclose that the FBI reports on Oswald had been read by officials in the clandestine operations division in 1962 and 1963. The cable was described as a "summary of the background information held in the Headquarters' file on Oswald."....

See also David Talbot: A tribute. Talbot's book on the issue: The Devil's Chessboard.

Oliver Stone still has questions about the JFK assassination

Guess which party supported the US invasion of Iraq?

Remember the Iraq war?

On the other hand, Trump wants to abandon Ukraine.

So does JD Vance