Friday, June 04, 2010

The return of C.W. Nevius

San Francisco Appeal suggested the other day that the return of the prodigal C.W. Nevius from the despised suburbs to Progressive Land would be eased if he became a bike guy, thus ingratiating himself with local progressives. It turns out, however, that Nevius is already something of a cyclist, though probably not the sort that participates in Critical Mass.

But the best thing about C.W. Nevius is that he's never seemed particularly interested in ingratiating himself with anyone, least of all the city's lefties. His offense in the eyes of his critics has been his relentless reporting on homelessness and quality-of-life issues in San Francisco that reveal city progressives as the clueless political tendency that they are. He even went so far as to express some mild skepticism about the city's plans to redesign city streets on behalf of cyclists. Nevius joins yours truly in a special purgatory we share with other critics of the "progressive" left in SF, Ken Garcia of the Examiner and Nevius's Chronicle colleague, Debra Saunders.

Some of Nevius's antagonists greeted his announced return to the City with graceless scorn. "Big twit[back] in big city," groaned Curbed, the real estate blog. Maybe the real estate folks figure his criticism of San Francisco is bad for business. If so they are wrong. Nevius's columns on homelessness have made the city a better place, especially Golden Gate Park.

Jim Herd of Citizen lamented his return by claiming that Nevius's "SF Gate column is a veritable fallacy factory." Herd doesn't offer any specifics for the charge, but the cheap shot is his specialty, not political analysis, and of course he's a bike guy.

Tim Redmond
over at the Guardian sniffs that "Chuck's got some work to do before he starts to understand San Francisco values." But Nevius seems to understand Redmond's "values" very well, and he's appropriately skeptical, especially on homelessness. (Redmond's political values: graffiti as art, the homeless as victims of society, True City Living, and a political approach that sees our politics as the Good Guys versus the Bad Guys.)

Nevius performed another huge public service with yesterday's column on the Democratic County Central Committee, which lately has been an insider game dominated by city progressives. Instead of the usual prog suspects, Nevius proposes some moderate candidates for the Committee that we non-progressives can vote for. In District 12: Bill Fazio, Matthew Tuchow, Mike Sullivan, Arlo Smith, John Shanley, Meagan Levitan, Alex Volberding, Mary Jung, Dan Dunnigan, Ron Dudum, Andrew Clark and Tom Hsieh. In District 13: Keith Baraka, Catherine Stefani, Stuart Smith, Scott Wiener, Calvin Louie, Joe Alioto Veronese, Owen O'Donnell, Linda Richardson, Leslie Katz, Chuck Hornbrook.

Labels: , , , ,


At 10:34 AM, Blogger murphstahoe said...

Before anyone looks at Rob and Chuck's slate and decides to vote the oppposite...

Keith Baraka is currently out of town riding his bike to Los Angeles on the AIDS ride.

I have personally ridden more miles on my bike with Chuck Hornbrook than I can count.

At 10:36 AM, Blogger Rob Anderson said...

I am just now going to vote, and I'll be sure not to vote for Baraka.

At 11:35 AM, Blogger murphstahoe said...

Rob Anderson - against funding AIDS research.

At 11:41 AM, Blogger Rob Anderson said...

John Murphy: horse's ass.

At 11:08 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

This is a late comment to this post, but lets distinguish between homeless and "street people". Street People are those who will not be permitted into shelters, SROs or any other housing program because they do not follow rules. They do not want to be told then cannot drink, do drugs etc. therefore they are not permitted to stay in a shelter. Instead they are on the street, usually under the influence of one or several controlled or "legal" substances. Let's face it when people get high and feel good (I enjoy a drink now and now and then) we can act silly and weird and do things we do not normally do. We lose inhibitions. The Street People live to enjoy feeling good while under the influence and after years of that lifestyle then to get crazy and in cases will do ANYTHING to get what they need to feel that way. So don't call them homeless, they are there by choice. THEY ARE STREET PEOPLE and there are already plenty of City provided detox clinics and help programs that they do not choose to avail themselves of. Sorry for being so long winded.

At 12:06 PM, Blogger Rob Anderson said...

That's an important distinction to make, but I didn't blur it in this post, where I only note Nevius's good work on the homeless issue that annoys city progs so much.

City progressives, however, routinely blur that distinction. In fact the implication of the prog approach to homelessness has always been that these drug and alcohol addled folks are just people who can't afford housing. That is, homelessness is essentially a housing problem, though anyone not blinkered by ideology can see that it's bullshit, that almost all the people living on our streets and in our parks have crippling drug problems and/or psychological problems.


Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home