Questions about that Amtrak derailment
Elaine Thompson, A.P. |
Randal O'Toole on the Amtrak derailment:
The wreck of the 501–--the Amtrak train that crashed near Seattle on Monday–--is raising lots of questions about Amtrak operations, but they aren’t always the right ones. Here are some questions that should be asked and some of the Antiplanner’s preliminary answers. Answers from Amtrak (the operator), FRA (the funder), Sound Transit (the track owner), or WSDOT (the train owner) may differ.
1. Congress required passenger railroads to install positive train control (PTC) by the end of 2015. Why did the Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) give money to the Washington Department of Transportation (WSDOT) for a new passenger rail line that would not open until after 2015 when the project didn’t guarantee funding for positive train control?
Answer: The Obama administration wanted to distribute high-speed rail funds to as many states as possible in order to build political backing for the program, so it couldn’t be bothered with positive train control. The tracks the train was on are owned by Sound Transit, which says it is installing PTC, but it won’t be finished until spring. Public releases of WSDOT’s application for funds for this train didn’t mention PTC.
2. Around 800 people die in railroad accidents a year. PTC would prevent only about one percent of these fatalities; far more would be saved by spending the same amount of money on better grade crossings and fencing of rail rights of way. Why do we put so much emphasis on an expensive technology that will do so little?
Answer: Accidents that PTC could have prevented tend to be more spectacular than people getting killed when a train hits their car at a grade crossing. This suggests that, when politicians decide where private businesses spend their money, it’ll get spent on grandiose programs rather than things that could really make a difference.
3. When an auto driver runs a red light and kills a pedestrian, we don’t blame the auto maker for not making driverless cars sooner; we blame the driver and, perhaps, the people who were supposed to train the driver.
Why blame this accident on the lack of positive train control when the train driver should have slowed down and Amtrak should have made sure the driver was qualified to operate this section of track?...
Labels: High-Speed Rail, Portland, Rail Projects, SMART train, Tech
1 Comments:
Good of you to mention the Obama-stimulus political pork-barrel motivations for this Amtrak bypass project. What most journalists seem to be disregarding is what a nice crony-capitalist gift this was to billionaire, Obama-chum Warren Buffet whose company owns the Burlington Northern railroad, whose freight trains will be liberated (by this bypass) from having to share tracks with Amtrak.
Post a Comment
<< Home