Thursday, May 02, 2019

Labels: , ,

11 Comments:

At 6:32 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

The real story is Hilary lost. Dems can't get over the tears causing a tissue shortage.

 
At 7:51 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Lots of not so repressed anger...not the least of which is reserved for her husband.

 
At 12:27 PM, Blogger Rob Anderson said...

She has every right to angry, since she should be president now instead of the contemptible, malicious clown the Russians helped elect.

 
At 4:45 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

"Russians helped elect"

Who are you going to cry about and blame in 2020? The dinasours?

 
At 12:49 PM, Blogger Rob Anderson said...

Like your despicable leader, you are denial about what Russia and the Repugnant Party did in 2016. Even treason is okay if it furthers the right-wing agenda.

 
At 7:06 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

More like in denial that Hilary has lost while you and the dems are stuck in the denial of truth. So full of shit can stick to one story. First collusion, then finances, then obstruction, then in to the AG. Dems just continuously throw crap out there for the lame duck citizens of California and New York. None of you can ever tell the truth. Some of it may be dishonesty. But most of the time the lies just make losers feel better about bullshit. Zero facts, zero evidence and proof. You use to kiss Muellers ass on your blog. What happened? His report contain too much honesty for you? Oh that's right... claimed to have read it but haven't read shit.

 
At 11:37 AM, Blogger Rob Anderson said...

Mueller's report detailed the Republican collusion with Russia and Trump's obstruction of justice. Your comment shows you haven't read it, but you can't fake it, which is surely why you're anonymous. You can't even manage to spell Hillary's name right in your fact-free comment! Typical from a Trump supporter: ignorant, semi-literate and nasty.

 
At 5:21 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Your entire statement is ignorant. Esp if all you have is to resort to is a typo and name calling. It's a bit childish.


That aside let's get to some facts. You have just stated that

"Mueller's report detailed the republican conclusion with Russia and Trump's obstruction of justice."

All false while you sit and say your honest. Had you honestly read the report as you've stated you had you would have known that it actually states the opposite. Or do you just want to bypass the truth? But I will give you a chance to get out of your bullshit and how about you show me where in the report it says that. What page? What part?

 
At 4:59 PM, Blogger Rob Anderson said...

For openers with this PDF version of the Mueller Report, start on page 52 of Volume 1 and read through page 172 about Russian contacts with the Trump campaign. Mueller decided that none of it was criminal, but the redactions tell us that this investigation is ongoing, that it was one of a dozen investigations Mueller handed off to other jurisdictions.

Volume 2 is all about obstruction of justice, which starts on page 200 of the PDF. You can take it from there, can't you? Some of the incidents Mueller lists were done by Trump on national TV. Others were reported by people in the White House who witnessed the crimes.

I posted the executive summary of Volume 2 last month, so there's no real doubt about what it contains. If there are in your mind, read on for the gory details!

Maybe you didn't get the news from Breitbart or Fox, but nearly 700 former federal prosecutors say that they would charge anyone with obstruction based on the evidence against Trump. Mueller would have indicted him, too, except Justice Department rules prevent indicting a sitting president.

We'll just have to wait until he leaves office---in 2021 for sure but maybe earlier depending on what this contemptible human being does in the interim.

 
At 3:26 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Russian contacts as well as all other contacts Trump campaign had started when he became the nominee. It's called part of the presidential electoral process. Perfectly legal. You do know what the word legal means don't you?

Why don't you start off on page 180 and read on. "no collusion" "no conspiracy to commit collusion" and no "federal law was broken"
Why twist it with your excuses and opinions.

There is nothing but more BS. You cant show me one shred of fact or evidence. Mueller was your golden boy. Over and over from you 'Mueller will charge him. Mueller has evidence" look at all of your previous comments. Every single one of them made as though Mueller had 100% evidence. Today you have backed off of that and now we have opinions, excuses and pointing the finger at the AG when it's not even his report.

All I want to know is where and on what page does it say guilty of collusionor obstruction and laws were broken. Nothing else. Where does it say any of it? You can't find it can you? And neither can the dems there would have filed for impeachment day one. You all think your God or the chosen ones. But the truth is one's shit smells worse than the other on your side.

 
At 6:04 PM, Blogger Rob Anderson said...

Page 180 does not have the material you put in quotation marks. And please provide a citation for my alleged quotes about Mueller in the next paragraph.

"The A.G." accepted the report and declared it his "baby." He then presumed to declare Trump innocent of obstruction of justice in spite of the specific instances Mueller listed in Volume II. He also misrepresented the report's contents to the public in his summary, which Mueller himself pointed out.

The many contacts Trump's people had with the Russians---listed in Volume I---didn't amount to an illegal conspiracy crime by Trump or anyone else in his orbit. As I pointed out, that national security investigation was handed off by Mueller to other agencies and is ongoing, which means that such evidence may still be forthcoming. But the criminal standard sets the bar very high, since a criminal conviction requires evidence "beyond a reasonable doubt" that a crime was committed, the highest standard of proof.

Mueller, by the way, said he didn't want to indict Trump for obstruction---or anything else, for that matter---because DOJ rules prevent indicting a sitting president. Note that Mueller specifically said he could not "exonerate" Trump from obstruction of justice. Please review Volume II for a list and discussion of Trump's instances of obstruction.

"Collusion" is not a federal crime, which is fortunate for a number of Trump people, since they colluded with Russians a number of times. Manafort even gave the Russians the Republican Party's demographic voting information on swing states that was probably helpful in the Russian's extensive internet disinformation campaign for Trump and against Hillary on Facebook and other platforms.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home