Tuesday, May 12, 2009

Randy Shaw and Care Not Cash

In complementing Mayor Newsom on Care Not Cash in BeyondChron, Randy Shaw is unique among city progressives, probably because he's had first-hand experience with the success of the program through the Tenderloin Housing Clinic. On the other hand, the pseudo-radicals at the Bay Guardian and Fog City treat the mayor with contempt, as if he was George W. Bush's surrogate in SF, even though he's clearly a liberal Democrat.

Shaw provides a narrative on how Care Not Cash came about, including the successful movement preserving SROs as housing for poor people and resisting their being turned into tourist hotels. This set the stage for Care Not Cash, which led to the SROs being leased to house the homeless with the $13 million the city used to hand out to the homeless every month even as they continued to live on the streets:

During the debate[last year] around the housing set-aside, the $13.5 million annually injected into nonprofit run housing through CNC was largely ignored. The chief reason was that such housing is leased, not owned by nonprofits, and to some minds is not “permanently affordable.” But to those living in leased housing through CNC, the fact that a nonprofit does not own the building is irrelevant. And anyone who thinks that SRO owners will transform their buildings into upscale accommodations at the expiration of their longterm leases is delusional; virtually all of the CNC SRO’s will remain forever affordable.

Shaw gives both Mayor Brown and Mayor Agnos credit for helping to save the SROs and thus setting the table for their use under Newsom's Care Not Cash, which cut the monthly payments to the homeless in exchange for housing and services.

Mayor Brown began funding nonprofits to lease SRO’s at subsidized rents in response to this imbalance, but this approach was limited by available funds. Brown was not willing to get into a public fight over using welfare grants to fund housing for the very poor. So we had a classic, Wire-like scenario of a program that gave welfare checks in amounts too small for recipients to avoid homelessness, and hence needed of a major overhaul. The political left knew that dramatically increased grants were politically impossible, and instead focused on preserving the status quo. Gavin Newsom, who had few allies on the left, then did what no politician on The Wire ever did: he took on a controversial issue head on.

Yes, to Newsom's eternal credit he took on the homeless issue when he was still a supervisor, while, as Shaw points out, the city's progressives essentially supported the status quo on homelessness. But he's much too kind to city progs, since, while the homeless crisis grew worse on our streets, the Bay Guardian left supported Food Not Bombs and the pie-throwers of the Biotic Baking Brigade. During the 2003 mayoral campaign, the left vilified Newsom as waging war on the poor with Care Not Cash, while his opponent, Matt Gonzalez, talked airily about the "root causes" of homelessness. The do-nothing approach by city progressives implied that the growing number of homeless people on our streets and in our parks was just something we have to live with under capitalism. Fortunately, city voters rejected the left's approach, passing Care Not Cash in 2002 and electing Newsom mayor in 2003.

Labels: , , ,


At 4:12 PM, Blogger missiondweller said...

Probably the one thing I give Newsom credit for but it was stunning watching the so called "proggresives" resist it so vehemently. It still remains one of the best examples of just how dysfunctional our City government is.

At 5:46 PM, Blogger DaveO said...

Any time the city "progressives" resist something so vehemently, it probably is something worthwhile...

What are the odds of breaking their stranglehold on the BOS in the near term?

At 8:45 PM, Blogger auweia said...

I can tell you why Randy Shaw gives kudos to care not cash. It's right here


At 11:05 PM, Blogger murphstahoe said...

The "progressives" have been resisting the MUNI fare hike and the removal of 7 MUNI lines.

I guess DaveO thinks it's a good idea.

Amusingly, one of the removed lines is on a stretch of road that is slated for a new bike lane. Since that bus will no longer exist, the negative determination in the EIR will no longer be applicable. Another victory by the bike nuts over the transit masses, I guess.

At 8:48 AM, Blogger Rob Anderson said...

This post has nothing to do with bikes, Murph. To a hammer like you the whole world looks like a nail. But thanks for sharing.

At 3:11 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Randy Shaw pretends to be a progressive but could care less about the tenants. He only cares about using City funds to fund his BeyondCron, write books and charge the City while he writes books and bills the City for the lawyers who work for him.

At 4:08 PM, Blogger Rob Anderson said...

Regardless of his motives---which I don't pretend to know---Shaw understands what's been happening with homeless policy in recent years. Tim Redmond in the Guardian, on the other hand, tells us in this week's edition that Care Not Cash was simply about "taking welfare money away from homeless people," which is so far from an adequate description I'd call it a lie if I didn't know what a dim bulb Redmond is. City progressives like Redmond, while evidently sincere, are stupid about a lot of important issues, with negative consequences for San Francisco.


Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home