Tuesday, January 12, 2016

Yes, Celia shits

Donald Trump pretended to be disgusted by the very thought of what Hillary did on her bathroom break during the debate. Trump is a stupid guy, but even he understands that women have bodies.

It reminds me of Jonathan Swift's poem, The Lady's Dressing Room, wherein Swift's protagonist is shocked to realize that his love object has bodily functions:

So things, which must not be expressed,
When plumped into the reeking chest,
Send up an excremental smell
To taint the parts from whence they fell.
The petticoats and gown perfume,
Which waft a stink round every room.
Thus finishing his grand survey,
Disgusted Strephon stole away
Repeating in his amorous fits,
Oh! Celia, Celia, Celia shits!

Labels: , , , ,

Deconstructing the "smart growth" theory

This Portland "progressive" explains why, under the Smart Growth theory, that city must destroy its neighborhoods. Our Planning Department operates on the same assumption. 

Randal O'Toole deconstructs this theory:

...Novick and other true believers nevertheless think that multifamily housing is better because people who live in such housing supposedly drive less. But where is the evidence for that? The San Francisco Bay Area has increased its population density by 65 percent and built 200 miles of new rail transit lines since 1980, yet per capita transit ridership has fallen by a third and per capita driving has increased.

Even if we believed planners who say that high-density, mixed-use developments lead people to drive less, we have to ask if this is the most cost-effective way of saving energy and reducing greenhouse gas emissions. As the Antiplanner has previously shown, the answer is clearly “No!”

Building more fuel-efficient cars using simple improvements such as substituting aluminum for steel, Diesels for gasoline, and streamlining for boxy designs can reduce greenhouse gas emissions at a cost of about $50 per ton of carbon emissions. Hybrid-electric cars or other alternative fuel sources can reduce emissions at a cost of about $100 per ton. But, even using the most optimistic data provided by the planners, urban densification costs several thousand dollars a ton to reduce emissions. In fact, it probably doesn’t reduce emissions at all because the increased traffic congestion ends up wasting a lot of fuel that could have been saved at lower densities.

Ironically, Portland’s densification plans were written before climate change was a major issue. At that time, the main goal was supposed to be farmland preservation and reduction of urban-service costs. Neither of those goals made sense: urbanization represents such a small share of United States that it is no threat to farmlands. A study commissioned by smart-growth advocates concluded that ridding the state of all its land-use regulations would result in just 1 percent more of Oregon’s Willamette Valley being developed (7.6 percent vs. 6.6 percent).

As far as urban service costs go, saving a few thousand dollars per home on service costs doesn’t do much good when you have to increase the price of homes by a couple hundred thousand dollars to do it.

Since those arguments made no sense, planners happily jumped on the global-warming bandwagon to claim that their predetermined densification strategy was necessary to save the planet. In fact, it is neither necessary nor useful in reducing carbon emissions, and those who say it is are either deceiving the public or have been deceived themselves...

Labels: , , , , ,

Affordable Divis meeting tonight

Recapping last month's meeting, we made major progress on our Community Plan, the product of our many gatherings and a reflection of our coalition's priorities and positions for future development. 

But because the plan addresses such a wide range of issues, we're hosting one last gathering to make sure we're in agreement on our Community Plan. 

Meeting to Finalize Community Plan
Tuesday, January 12th at 7pm
Club Waziema (543 Divisadero St.)

Labels: , ,