Wednesday, April 28, 2021

SF drug crisis: Good intentions "hurting people"

Thomas Fuller did a follow-up on his story I posted about the other day:
While reporting a recent article on the drug overdose crisis in San Francisco, I called Thomas Wolf, one of the loudest critics of the city’s policies, to run past him what I was hearing from professors and other experts who have spent their lives studying drug use.

“Forgive me for saying this,” Mr. Wolf politely told me, “but those people who you said you talked to — the experts — they have never shot dope, man. They never stuck a needle in their neck. They never spent a night on the street.”

Mr. Wolf has done all of those things, which makes him one of the most poignant voices in the debate over what San Francisco should do to address an epidemic that claimed 713 lives last year, more than twice as many as died from the coronavirus in the city in 2020.

Wolf seems to confirm what I was saying the other day: without radical intervention the overdose deaths will continue in San Francisco:
Mr. Wolf was arrested five times between April and June 2018 for drug possession. The sixth time, he was jailed and charged with violating a stay-away order and intent to sell drugs. In jail, he was given medication to help relieve his withdrawal symptoms. He was bailed out by his brother on the condition that he enter rehab. He is now back with his family.
That last arrest was the turning point for Wolf. Interesting to note that he got some medication that time. Was that unusual, or are addicts routinely offered withdrawal medication?
A lifelong Democrat, Mr. Wolf says he shares the goals of harm reduction in San Francisco. But he argues that some of the programs that the city funds, like handing out foil and straws to fentanyl users, cross the line into enabling drug use. The city’s nonjudgmental approach to drug use is hurting the people it is meant to help, he says. (emphasis added)

“The Tenderloin has always been the drug users’ and dealers’ epicenter in San Francisco,” Mr. Wolf said. “But in recent years, you’ve created the environment of easy access to drugs 24/7.”
The same goes for providing addicts with clean needles and a safe place to shoot up. That's well-intentioned tolerance gone awry. Instead, anyone shooting up in public should be arrested and put in jail.

There they should be put in the care of doctors who can provide medication like the stuff Wolf was given and offered comprehensive drug treatment to break the self-destructive addiction cycle.



Labels: , , ,

2 Comments:

At 12:03 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Article on sfgate from June, 2012 (i.e. almost ten years ago) detailed how easy it was for a woman who looked like a suburban soccer mom to score hydrocodone out in the open on Turk Street in the middle of the day:
Scoring some Vike just a quick stroll away

The first group she approached told her:
"This street is just weed," one said loudly, as if he were a sales clerk in a department store. "Next street is prescription drugs."
He pointed up Jones toward Turk Street, where other men loitered, huddling in twos or threes then moving on. I sidled up to one and again asked about Vicodin and OxyContin.
"Vike!" he shouted to a man on a bicycle.

Of course the real deadly change since then is fentanyl.

 
At 8:27 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

I was recently was on a zoom community call with the captain of southern station, and the DA had a representative at the meeting to answer questions. I had, what I thought, was a simple question and was somewhat amazed at a circular answer, to which I replied "I do not understand", I just wanted to know if the DA considered fentanyl a danger to the community, and how come dealers of it are released, sometimes with stay away orders they violate. The DA rep told me to write her an email. Below is that exchange. What would your recommend? Frankly i don't see that the DA is willing to put anything in writing.


Me: My question and my not understanding your response to that question (are not dealers of fentanyl considered a danger to our community, and a priority to prosecute- a danger not only to users but the residents and businesses), seemingly dealers are arrested and released and not prosecuted. Those that are prosecuted may still be released on their own recognizance and issued stay away orders which they violate, and continue to return to sell all types of drugs, fentanyl being the one I am focused on with this question. Am I wrong? Am i reading news that is fake? What do you know about this? What happens when they violate stay away orders? How many times are the same dealers arrested? Please correct my understanding, because I do not understand.
Thank you.



Response:

Good afternoon,

Thanks for following up. I am happy to go over these questions with you. What days are you available to speak over the phone? Afternoons/early evenings work for me.


Me:
Isn't this something that an email response would cover?


Response:
The answers to your questions require an interactive discussion. The necessity to explain how the SF court system functions as a whole is far too much, particularly in terms of time-consumption, to break down via email. Let me know times that work for you in the next week for me to contact you. I will answer your questions, and follow ups you likely will have. You may take any notes you find relevant to your understanding.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home