The "fetal heartbeat" lie
In May, Live Science published an article titled “Is a ‘Fetal Heartbeat’ Really a Heartbeat at Six Weeks?”
The article begins as follows:
So far this year, four U.S. states have passed laws banning abortions when a fetal heartbeat can be detected, at around six weeks of pregnancy; several additional states are also considering these so-called heartbeat bills.
But what exactly do we mean when we talk about a “fetal heartbeat” at six weeks of pregnancy? Although some people might picture a heart-shaped organ beating inside a fetus, this is not the case.
Rather, at six weeks of pregnancy, an ultrasound can detect “a little flutter in the area that will become the future heart of the baby,” said Dr. Saima Aftab, medical director of the Fetal Care Center at Nicklaus Children’s Hospital in Miami. This flutter happens because the group of cells that will become the future “pacemaker” of the heart gain the capacity to fire electrical signals, she said.
This is all very interesting scientifically speaking, but this article suffers from a fatal flaw—the author took abortion opponents at their word and assumed they actually cared about when the fetal heartbeat begins. They don’t.
As a quick aside, the term “fetus” is not used until quite a bit after six weeks. At six weeks, it’s still an embryo. In other words, the entire term “fetal heartbeat,” as applied to laws banning abortions after six weeks, is a misnomer. But abortion opponents don’t care about that, either.
It is true that a number of abortion bills over the past few years have wanted to ban the procedure after six weeks specifically, and that these bills have been called “heartbeat bills.”
It is also true that abortion opponents make much of the claim that there is a heartbeat at six weeks. The rub is that abortion opponents use this claim only because they believe it will be persuasive to others, not because they put any stock in the presence of a heartbeat themselves...
Labels: Atheism and Religion, Science, The Repugnant Party
5 Comments:
Not to get into pro or anti-abortion. Real Medical science only...
5 1/2-6 weeks according to all non one-sided pro abortion science.
No one is "pro-abortion," but women shouldn't be forced to have babies for crackpot theological reasons.
I agree "women shouldn't be forced to have babies". However,. There are more than enough birth control options out there, some free and some really cheap. With few exceptions they need to be responsible. They can't continuesly blame anyone that is anti-abortion for their pregnancy. Rape victim, life threatening, things like that I totally understand. Abortion clinics today are being used like a McDonald's drive-thru
If some states ignore federal drug and immigration laws, others now ignore abortion laws. Yeah, that's the consequence of going al la carte.
What the anti-abortion movement is really about: first, among many Christians it's about forcing women/girls to have babies for theological reasons, that is for bullshit. Second, it's about a creepy conservative obsession with women's sexuality.
That's it: bullshit and creepiness.
Post a Comment
<< Home