Not surprising that a Trump guy like you has a reading disorder. Brittany Kaiser was not a "director" at Cambridge Analytica; she was merely on its staff. When she worked on the 2012 Obama campaign, she wasn't working there.
Unlike Cambridge Analytica, the Obama campaign, didn't steal or use Facebook data without permission: see this and this.
But the Trump campaign paid Cambridge Analytica millions in 2016. According to Maddow's report here, there are interesting connections between Russia, Wikileaks, and Cambridge Analytica during the 2016 campaign. Russia hacked the DNC, gave the info to Wikileaks, and Cambridge Analytica offered to help Wikileaks sort it out and weaponize it.
Mueller surely knows all this stuff already. Trump is not only a lying sack of shit and a contemptible human being, he may also be guilty of treason. He's going down and the sooner the better.
Kaiser worked for the obama compaign in 2008. And yes she was a director and Cambridge go check it out. Besides that everyone is acting like Cambridge analytica is some sort of an illegal company. Marketing and elections is what they do. They offer data to help push your business or election. Or so that you can understand it a consulting firm. Hence "analytica" in other words analytics. Some hire firms like this one to gather data and others collect their own. For example the Safeway club card. Paying them a dollar or twenty thousand dollars or a million is called a consultation fee hello??? Obama paid as well although undisclosed.
Maddow is an idiot. Oh yeah I bank at the Wells Fargo that was robbed last week. Interesting connection? Maybe? Oh this person knew a Russian oh that person spoke to Wikileaks while at the same time hilary blames wives listening to their husbands and her husband blaming comey. Really???
I hate trump therefore I have to be an idiot and believe all of this bullshit. Is that the new logic now?
Listen man... no matter the breed dog shit is dog shit.
Kaiser was director of business development as well as director of program development. She was not a simple staffer but senior. That's a fact not an arguement.
"You need to provide a link or citation to support it". What does this mean? Your the one telling me that I'm wrong here. Do you make statements not backed up by facts? I was only trying to be polite by suggesting you go check it out. I'm not trying to make anybody look stupid.
Maddow is far more intelligent to believe the crap that comes out of her mouth. So the fact that she says it does indeed make her an idiot.
A simple analogy The grass is in the ground and it's green. Hmmmmm interesting connection. Is the the ground hiding something??? Oh you have grass in your back yard. Another interesting connection. Hmmm what are you hiding? Why is your ground covered by grass hmmm.
Don't give me that stupid shit. Just tell me how it grows or move on.
Now Cambridge a legal company that advertises they help you with elections world wide were used by trump. Well so what it's what they do. Coca-Cola provides beverages these provide data and help with your election. Big deal. Obviously they do a pretty good job obama used them. So an ex employee of Cambridge who just happened to once be an obama compaign volunteer helping with media meets with the founder of Wikileaks. Ok so what? That's an interesting connection? All of a sudden this is the biggest deal and just proves trump worked with the Russians and we just now found out he worked with Wikileaks now?
According to that/her logic tomorrow a Sean hannity can come out of the woods and during prime time state that a former obama compaign volunteer met with Wikileaks founder assange. I wonder why? Was she helping the Russians hack the dnc to set up trump? Why is she meeting with assange? Did she give him the hacked dnc info to post on Wikileaks? Interesting connection hmmm.
That's like saying you bought a gallon of Clorox bleach from the supermarket and paid cash. The next day a kid drinks Clorox in China and died. So what happened? Did you make a cash payment financing the bleach murder of the kid? Is that the "connection".
The entire federal government has russian connections. Obama as president had burgers with the president of Russia. Interesting lunch. Does that make him a traitor?
This is all fucking stupid and she continues to just roll with it. She's far too intelligent for the dumb shit so it makes her an idiot.
Maddow needs to hold off and let don lemon at CNN continue looking like a dumb ass. And then when the time is right with facts in hand is when she can come back and drop the hammer. She's too smart for anything else.
Okay, was that so hard? The links I provided didn't say she was a "director," whatever that means in this context. Your link did.
Here's how the Trump/Russian thing apparently developed: The Russians hacked the DNC and gave the results to Wikileaks to make public. Russia did that to help Trump beat Hillary. The Russians also had an extensive fake news operation during the campaign here in the US, which is why Mueller indicted some Russians earlier this year.
A number of Trump's people, including his son and son-in-law, had contacts with Russian agents during and after the campaign. Lifting the sanctions on Russia was apparently discussed in some of those contacts.
The exact nature of those contacts will presumably be revealed when Mueller makes his report later this year.
Why would Trump want Russia admitted to the G-7 group? Recall that Russia was sanctioned by the US and Europe after it invaded and occupied Crimea and eastern Ukraine. What is Trump up to? I suspect it has to do with his company and Russian money, which is why he doesn't release his tax returns. There's no rational justification for his solicitous approach to Russia, unless it's just about expressing his gratitude for helping him get elected.
Trump making his tax returns public do nothing. Show us his income, deductions, and tax payment? So what. He filled a financial disclosure which is public to run for president. A government agency (IRS) already has trumps tax filing, financial info as well as a copy of trumps tax returns. Financial institutions are the easiest to get to and we're probably the first thing they looked at. You ever been through an audit? The IRS would access your bank accounts from their computer. A search warrant for book keeping as well and so on. They would have nailed him with this one the first month had there been anything.
The more and more I read on about the hacked emails the more I'm beginning to believe that they were leaked by an insider/employee at the dnc who happened to an upset Bernie supporter. DNC never allowed anybody to take a look at the servers including the FBI. Why refused that unless unless you had something to hide? Covering your own ass for screwing bernie for hilary. Anyway this is where I'm stuck. Intelligence agencies stated that while dnc computers were being hacked, many attempts to hack the RNC by these same "Russian intelligent agencies." So two questions..... first question.... why wouldn't you let anybody take a look at the hacked servers? It would have helped with how the hack happened and figuring out the exact source. Second question... if the Russians hacked the dnc to help trump why would they want to hack the RNC computers as well? Assuming had they been hacked the info would have been leaked how would that have helped trump? What would hacking the RNC do?
Whatever muller is looking at I don't believe it's the finances or emails. I don't believe that to be the angle. Makes no sense. Whatever he has they're keeping a tight lip for now.
"He filled a financial disclosure which is public to run for president. A government agency (IRS) already has trumps tax filing, financial info as well as a copy of trumps tax returns. Financial institutions are the easiest to get to and we're probably the first thing they looked at. You ever been through an audit? The IRS would access your bank accounts from their computer. A search warrant for book keeping as well and so on. They would have nailed him with this one the first month had there been anything."
"Whatever Muller is looking at I don't believe it's the finances"
What's more moronic? One commenting out of their ass without reading? Or a jackass calling someone a moron?
You're right. Name-calling is wrong, which is why I deleted the "moron" crack.
But even Trump's supporters must understand that Mueller is looking at his finances. His solicitous treatment of Putin and Russia is hard to explain without more information and explanation.
Trump's son confirmed several years ago that they got money from Russia.
Of course the IRS has Trump's tax returns, but they can't make them public. Mueller surely has them, too, along with a lot of other financial information.
All the stuff the Feds seized from Michael Cohen probably was a lot of interesting stuff, too. Which means he and Trump are both going down, probably for money-laundering and other financial hanky-panky.
Like anyone who talks a lot on TV, Maddow gets some things wrong. So what? The polls before the election showed Hillary winning, and of course Maddow hoped they were right. The polls, as everyone now knows, were wrong. So what? Clinton, not George H.W. Bush signed the NAFTA agreement. So what? A relatively trivial factual error.
More importantly, Maddow is right about how awful Trump is. Many more damning videos could be made about all the things he gets wrong.
North Korea got a highly-publicized meeting with the President of the United States, and Trump got three American hostages released in exchange. Trump even got that wrong, since two of the hostages were imprisoned early in his administration. A good deal for North Korea, but not for the US. And, not coincidentally, it turns out that North Korea apparently has no intention of giving up its nukes as Trump claimed.
13 Comments:
So this former Cambridge analytica director that worked for the Obama campaign and went on to vote for sanders met with Assange last year?
Ok and?
Not surprising that a Trump guy like you has a reading disorder. Brittany Kaiser was not a "director" at Cambridge Analytica; she was merely on its staff. When she worked on the 2012 Obama campaign, she wasn't working there.
Unlike Cambridge Analytica, the Obama campaign, didn't steal or use Facebook data without permission: see this and this.
But the Trump campaign paid Cambridge Analytica millions in 2016. According to Maddow's report here, there are interesting connections between Russia, Wikileaks, and Cambridge Analytica during the 2016 campaign. Russia hacked the DNC, gave the info to Wikileaks, and Cambridge Analytica offered to help Wikileaks sort it out and weaponize it.
Mueller surely knows all this stuff already. Trump is not only a lying sack of shit and a contemptible human being, he may also be guilty of treason. He's going down and the sooner the better.
Supporting trump or not is irrelevant.
Kaiser worked for the obama compaign in 2008. And yes she was a director and Cambridge go check it out. Besides that everyone is acting like Cambridge analytica is some sort of an illegal company. Marketing and elections is what they do. They offer data to help push your business or election. Or so that you can understand it a consulting firm. Hence "analytica" in other words analytics. Some hire firms like this one to gather data and others collect their own. For example the Safeway club card. Paying them a dollar or twenty thousand dollars or a million is called a consultation fee hello??? Obama paid as well although undisclosed.
Maddow is an idiot. Oh yeah I bank at the Wells Fargo that was robbed last week. Interesting connection? Maybe? Oh this person knew a Russian oh that person spoke to Wikileaks while at the same time hilary blames wives listening to their husbands and her husband blaming comey. Really???
I hate trump therefore I have to be an idiot and believe all of this bullshit. Is that the new logic now?
Listen man... no matter the breed dog shit is dog shit.
You make an argument and then tell me to "go check it out." It's your argument, not mine. You need to provide a link or citation to support it.
Yes, Kaiser worked for Obama and Cambridge, but I don't see that she was a "director" there. In any event, she's now a whistle-blower!
Rachel Maddow is "an idiot"? Again no evidence provided. Maddow is a national treasure the way she's following the Trump debacle day-to-day.
You're not a Trump supporter but you denigrate all the Russian connections he and his other stooges have?
Kaiser was director of business development as well as director of program development. She was not a simple staffer but senior. That's a fact not an arguement.
"You need to provide a link or citation to support it". What does this mean? Your the one telling me that I'm wrong here. Do you make statements not backed up by facts? I was only trying to be polite by suggesting you go check it out. I'm not trying to make anybody look stupid.
To satisfy you let's start with the easiest.
https://www.linkedin.com/in/brittany-kaiser-484b577
Maddow is far more intelligent to believe the crap that comes out of her mouth. So the fact that she says it does indeed make her an idiot.
A simple analogy The grass is in the ground and it's green. Hmmmmm interesting connection. Is the the ground hiding something??? Oh you have grass in your back yard. Another interesting connection. Hmmm what are you hiding? Why is your ground covered by grass hmmm.
Don't give me that stupid shit. Just tell me how it grows or move on.
Now Cambridge a legal company that advertises they help you with elections world wide were used by trump. Well so what it's what they do. Coca-Cola provides beverages these provide data and help with your election. Big deal. Obviously they do a pretty good job obama used them. So an ex employee of Cambridge who just happened to once be an obama compaign volunteer helping with media meets with the founder of Wikileaks. Ok so what? That's an interesting connection? All of a sudden this is the biggest deal and just proves trump worked with the Russians and we just now found out he worked with Wikileaks now?
According to that/her logic tomorrow a Sean hannity can come out of the woods and during prime time state that a former obama compaign volunteer met with Wikileaks founder assange. I wonder why? Was she helping the Russians hack the dnc to set up trump? Why is she meeting with assange? Did she give him the hacked dnc info to post on Wikileaks? Interesting connection hmmm.
That's like saying you bought a gallon of Clorox bleach from the supermarket and paid cash. The next day a kid drinks Clorox in China and died. So what happened? Did you make a cash payment financing the bleach murder of the kid? Is that the "connection".
The entire federal government has russian connections. Obama as president had burgers with the president of Russia. Interesting lunch. Does that make him a traitor?
This is all fucking stupid and she continues to just roll with it. She's far too intelligent for the dumb shit so it makes her an idiot.
Maddow needs to hold off and let don lemon at CNN continue looking like a dumb ass. And then when the time is right with facts in hand is when she can come back and drop the hammer. She's too smart for anything else.
Okay, was that so hard? The links I provided didn't say she was a "director," whatever that means in this context. Your link did.
Here's how the Trump/Russian thing apparently developed: The Russians hacked the DNC and gave the results to Wikileaks to make public. Russia did that to help Trump beat Hillary. The Russians also had an extensive fake news operation during the campaign here in the US, which is why Mueller indicted some Russians earlier this year.
A number of Trump's people, including his son and son-in-law, had contacts with Russian agents during and after the campaign. Lifting the sanctions on Russia was apparently discussed in some of those contacts.
The exact nature of those contacts will presumably be revealed when Mueller makes his report later this year.
Why would Trump want Russia admitted to the G-7 group? Recall that Russia was sanctioned by the US and Europe after it invaded and occupied Crimea and eastern Ukraine. What is Trump up to? I suspect it has to do with his company and Russian money, which is why he doesn't release his tax returns. There's no rational justification for his solicitous approach to Russia, unless it's just about expressing his gratitude for helping him get elected.
Donald Trump Sure Seems to Like Russia a Lot, Doesn’t He?
Trump making his tax returns public do nothing. Show us his income, deductions, and tax payment? So what. He filled a financial disclosure which is public to run for president. A government agency (IRS) already has trumps tax filing, financial info as well as a copy of trumps tax returns. Financial institutions are the easiest to get to and we're probably the first thing they looked at. You ever been through an audit? The IRS would access your bank accounts from their computer. A search warrant for book keeping as well and so on. They would have nailed him with this one the first month had there been anything.
The more and more I read on about the hacked emails the more I'm beginning to believe that they were leaked by an insider/employee at the dnc who happened to an upset Bernie supporter. DNC never allowed anybody to take a look at the servers including the FBI. Why refused that unless unless you had something to hide? Covering your own ass for screwing bernie for hilary. Anyway this is where I'm stuck. Intelligence agencies stated that while dnc computers were being hacked, many attempts to hack the RNC by these same "Russian intelligent agencies."
So two questions..... first question.... why wouldn't you let anybody take a look at the hacked servers? It would have helped with how the hack happened and figuring out the exact source. Second question... if the Russians hacked the dnc to help trump why would they want to hack the RNC computers as well? Assuming had they been hacked the info would have been leaked how would that have helped trump? What would hacking the RNC do?
Whatever muller is looking at I don't believe it's the finances or emails. I don't believe that to be the angle. Makes no sense. Whatever he has they're keeping a tight lip for now.
What I said in regards to Trump's finances.....
"He filled a financial disclosure which is public to run for president. A government agency (IRS) already has trumps tax filing, financial info as well as a copy of trumps tax returns. Financial institutions are the easiest to get to and we're probably the first thing they looked at. You ever been through an audit? The IRS would access your bank accounts from their computer. A search warrant for book keeping as well and so on. They would have nailed him with this one the first month had there been anything."
"Whatever Muller is looking at I don't believe it's the finances"
What's more moronic? One commenting out of their ass without reading? Or a jackass calling someone a moron?
You don't think Muller[sic] is looking at Trump's finances? I guess you can't learn about that on Fox News or Breitbart.
You're right. Name-calling is wrong, which is why I deleted the "moron" crack.
But even Trump's supporters must understand that Mueller is looking at his finances. His solicitous treatment of Putin and Russia is hard to explain without more information and explanation.
Trump's son confirmed several years ago that they got money from Russia.
Of course the IRS has Trump's tax returns, but they can't make them public. Mueller surely has them, too, along with a lot of other financial information.
All the stuff the Feds seized from Michael Cohen probably was a lot of interesting stuff, too. Which means he and Trump are both going down, probably for money-laundering and other financial hanky-panky.
Maddow always tells the truth.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=h5bf0CvoTls
Like anyone who talks a lot on TV, Maddow gets some things wrong. So what? The polls before the election showed Hillary winning, and of course Maddow hoped they were right. The polls, as everyone now knows, were wrong. So what? Clinton, not George H.W. Bush signed the NAFTA agreement. So what? A relatively trivial factual error.
More importantly, Maddow is right about how awful Trump is. Many more damning videos could be made about all the things he gets wrong.
North Korea got a highly-publicized meeting with the President of the United States, and Trump got three American hostages released in exchange. Trump even got that wrong, since two of the hostages were imprisoned early in his administration. A good deal for North Korea, but not for the US. And, not coincidentally, it turns out that North Korea apparently has no intention of giving up its nukes as Trump claimed.
Post a Comment
<< Home