Tuesday, November 14, 2017

Our "decision-makers" gentrify San Francisco

Noah Berger, The Chronicle

John King throws a bouquet to the horrific Salesforce tower in downtown San Francisco:
For anyone who wonders how an edifice of such height rose in a notoriously height-wary city, there’s a simple answer. Decision-makers got their wish. “We’re doing what every international city is doing,” Dean Macris, the city’s planning director from 2004 until 2007, said last month. “We’re rethinking density"...

“The uglification of San Francisco continues apace,” read one letter to The Chronicle after images of the three contenders were made public. Another complained: “The San Francisco skyline has already been ruined once by Manhattanization. Why do it again, only worse this time?”
John King, who writes about planning issues for the Chronicle, has long favored highrise development downtown, and he also inexplicably has been infatuated with Octavia Blvd., a planning/traffic fiasco created after the city voted to take down the Central Freeway overpass in the Hayes Valley neighborhood.

But, alas, King's highrise dreams are now coming true for San Francisco. I laughed when he gave credit to Chris Daly, the boorish ultra-left former city supervisor:
But the mood among a younger generation was different. For them, the measurement of a tower is the advantages it might bring. There’s no better example than Chris Daly, a former tenant activist who represented South of Market on the Board of Supervisors from 2001 to 2011. He also served on the Transbay Joint Powers Authority when it voted to embark on the design-development competition.

“My views on height were a different take than the older progressive approach,” Daly, now a union organizer in Nevada, said this month. “For me, it was never about whether or not there was a tower — I’m not a planner. The question was, how do you make sure that when you increase density there are benefits for the community that I represent?”
Oh, yes, giants strode the streets of the city in days of yore! 

Daly---and his "progressive" comrades on the board of supervisors, including Aaron Peskin---paved the way for the present highrise boom in the city by endorsing the Rincon Hill project.

Still waiting to learn about the "benefits" those highrise condos for the rich provided to, say, people in the Tenderloin. 

And "I'm not a planner" is a weasel-worded cop-out, as if the decision to allow that project was a technical issue, not a political decision about what kind of city was being created. See Rincon Hill revisited.

See also Chris Daly and the progressive agenda and Chris Daly: A retrospective.

Labels: , , , , , , ,

3 Comments:

At 1:46 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

I have lived in west soma for 15 years and the city all my life. I have not seen one red cent of improvements from the funds he extorted from highrise development. In west soma, a place without much open space or green things...there remains nothing. In west soma, home of street people and all their bad behavior and "left overs"...we have seen zero improvement and no encouragement of policing the area. In west soma, nothing has changed.

 
At 7:31 PM, Blogger Rob Anderson said...

It was all bullshit from the start. Daly thought he was driving a hard bargain with the Rincon Hill developers, but in reality they played him for a chump, allowing him to think he was an important player.

Then he did some chest-thumping about how he had stuck it to the "Downtown interests" by making the deal to allow luxury highrise condos on Rincon Hill, which is what they wanted to do in the first place! That he got slightly higher development fees in the deal was just chump change for people who build highrises in downtown San Francisco.

The truth about city progressives is that they've done a lot of damage to the city since the prog wave of 2000, the first year district elections kicked in.

They screwed up the homeless issue and then turned the bicycle fantasy into the most important issue in the city, while rolling over for developers and allowing them to turn SF into Highriseville, which they called "Smart Growth"!

Like every board since 2000, the present board too has essentially been co-opted by City Hall's permanent government, particularly the Planning Dept. and the MTA.

 
At 11:50 AM, Blogger Rob Anderson said...

Here's a functional link for that "ass-kicking" post.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home